Comments on: The Long Con http://www.gitsiegirl.com/the-long-con.htm Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:08:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1 by: alabama fosamax http://www.gitsiegirl.com/the-long-con.htm#comment-92879 Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:27:32 +0000 http://www.gitsiegirl.com/the-long-con.htm#comment-92879 leg fosamax <a href="http://fosamax.vidilife.com" rel="nofollow">plus fosamax</a> leg fosamax plus fosamax

]]> by: Scott http://www.gitsiegirl.com/the-long-con.htm#comment-34 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:15:33 +0000 http://www.gitsiegirl.com/the-long-con.htm#comment-34 Vincent especially showing up... I don't know whether it was just a trick by the writers to make us *think* it was the others and not Charlie. But, the dog *and* the rain. That is weird how he is associated with so much - and since the very first episode too. I used to theorize about some kind of "time loop" too but when I heard the creators say (I think it was on the "making of" on the DVD set...) that everything is explainable, I thought... "Okay, maybe not." Still... I'm *VERY* curious (skeptical?) how all of this is going to be explainable. Ted McGinley?!?!?! NOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Vincent especially showing up… I don’t know whether it was just a trick by the writers to make us *think* it was the others and not Charlie. But, the dog *and* the rain. That is weird how he is associated with so much - and since the very first episode too.

I used to theorize about some kind of “time loop” too but when I heard the creators say (I think it was on the “making of” on the DVD set…) that everything is explainable, I thought… “Okay, maybe not.” Still… I’m *VERY* curious (skeptical?) how all of this is going to be explainable.

Ted McGinley?!?!?! NOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]> by: Dewayne Mikkelson http://www.gitsiegirl.com/the-long-con.htm#comment-33 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:16:45 +0000 http://www.gitsiegirl.com/the-long-con.htm#comment-33 Wow, that is a REALLY LONG CON errrr I mean Post. I like all the points you brought up and I am looking forward to which ones turn out to be correct! Wow, that is a REALLY LONG CON errrr I mean Post. I like all the points you brought up and I am looking forward to which ones turn out to be correct!

]]>